Southampton Scientist Investigates Russian Meteor
Dr Hugh Lewis from the University of Southampton has analysed the recent
extraordinary Russian meteor event using the "NEOImpactor" tool, which
was developed by researchers from the University and designed to
investigate the risks faced by the Earth from asteroid impacts.
On the morning of Friday 15 February, an asteroid estimated to be the
size of a five-storey building entered the atmosphere over the Urals
region of Russia and disintegrated. It generated a blastwave that blew
out windows and damaged buildings in the city of Chelyabinsk, injuring
more than 1000 people. Just a few hours later, the world witnessed the
40 metre asteroid 2012 DA14 pass between the Earth and the ring of
geostationary satellites; the closest approach of an object this size
for a century.
Dr Lewis, a Lecturer in Aerospace Engineering, explained the
significance of the event: "This is the first time that we've seen
injuries resulting from a collision between the Earth and an asteroid. I
think that what surprised most people was the scale of the damage from a
relatively small object and the fact that we didn't have any warning."
In fact, the asteroid's size explains the lack of warning, he said.
"Small asteroids are very difficult to spot with telescopes because they only reflect a little sunlight."
Scientists have suggested that the energy released in the blast was equivalent to 500 kilotonnes of TNT.
Using the NEOImpactor tool and estimates of the size, speed and path,
Dr Lewis simulated the flight of the meteor up to the point where it
disintegrated above Chelyabinsk. NEOImpactor then provided an estimate
of the number of people affected by the shockwave and the cost of damage
to the buildings in the region.
"The results show that a few thousand people in the Chelyabinsk
region could have been affected by the blastwave with damage to the
surrounding area costing about 100 million dollars, which fits with what
happened, " he said. "The number of people living in this part of
Russia is quite low except for those in a few towns and cities, such as
Chelyabinsk. So, even a small change in the path of the meteor would
likely have resulted in fewer casualties," he added. "In fact, the
number of casualties we might expect for an asteroid of this size is
very close to zero."
However, Dr Lewis also explained what might have happened if the
meteor had arrived on the same trajectory but a few hours later.
"The city of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne is at the same latitude as
Chelyabinsk. Had the meteor arrived about four hours later, on the same
trajectory, the blastwave could have had similar consequences for the UK
city."
Dr Lewis also used the NEOImpactor tool to investigate the possible
consequences of larger asteroids colliding with the Earth. In the last
month, the Earth has experienced an approach by the 330 metre asteroid
2004 MN4, also called "Apophis," and the smaller, 40 metre asteroid 2012
DA14, which made its closest approach just hours after the meteor over
Russia. For an asteroid the size of 2012 DA14, NEOImpactor estimated
that 10,000 people could be affected, on average, if it impacted
anywhere in the world. In contrast, an average of nearly one million
people could be affected if asteroid Apophis were to collide with the
Earth, with many more casualties arising if it impacted in a densely
populated region.
Most of the asteroids and comets over one kilometre in size that are
potentially hazardous to the Earth have been identified, their orbits
around the sun calculated and impacts have been ruled out for the next
100 years. What's more, telescopes are now being used to look for
smaller asteroids.
However, the event in Russia has highlighted the need to continue to
invest in such sky surveys and to develop an effective plan of action in
case an asteroid is discovered on a collision course with the Earth.
Coincidentally, such a plan was being discussed at the Vienna meeting of
the United Nations Action Team 14 on Near Earth Objects at the time of
the Russian meteor event. The UK plays a key role in this team.
"NEOImpactor, and similar tools being developed at the University,
can help to support the planning of mitigation measures," Dr Lewis said,
"as they provide important context that can shape decisions."
In spite of the recent, dramatic demonstration of the risks posed by
asteroids, there is reason to be optimistic about the future, he added:
"The human race already has the technology to deflect an asteroid if we are given sufficient warning."
In fact, Dr Lewis is currently using the tools developed at the
University within a European-wide project investigating mitigation
options for the European Space Agency (ESA). The outputs from this work
will help to support ESA's role in the global response to the asteroid
threat.